Since Bible students are still committed to arguing
the timing of the rapture and even teaming up with heretics to do so, I thought I would spend some time refuting arguments
from both the pretrib and posttrib camp.
The purpose of this string of messages is to show the futility of arguing
such stuff when there are those out there that aren't even saved and don't even know who Christ is.
I will also post
my refutations this website:
http://cuf5.tripod.com
My messages along this line are entitled Pantribulationism
with the name of the argument following it.
For example: Pantribulationism: Apostasy
I know of someone that teams up with those that don't believe
in the Trinity and one that is a Preterist (believes Christ has come already and the resurrection is past), to oppose me because
I happen to be a pretribber that thinks turning groups into places where the rapture is all we talk about is wrong.
I
don't know what we shall be like, but when he comes we shall be like him. (1 John 3:2)
This hope purifies me, not his
timing.
I'm not certain when Christ will come, but I know he will come and he is pissed.
So to be fair and to
keep a lid on peoples emotions, I am going to alternate between refuting a posttrib argument and a pretrib argument.
The
purpose of this is to show the futility of arguing this matter.
Stay Tuned
BJ Maxwell
|